John W Mina
Orange County Sheriff’s Office Agency Persons Were Served with an Averment of Jurisdiction in 2026
Agencies Operating as Police Departments via City and County Under States Have Been Violating People’s Constitutional Rights for Decades at North America
North America – Orlando, Florida— In a high-stakes lawful / legal and jurisdictional confrontation that highlights the growing friction between United States Constitutional law and modern municipal policy-enforcement (pretending to be Law Enforcement), the Orange County Sheriff’s Office (OCSO) was formally served on October 6, 2026 A.D., with an Averment of Jurisdiction – Quo Warranto.
The extraordinary lawful writ targets Orange County Sheriff’s Office leadership, including acting Sheriff John W. Mina, and Austin Boniface (Badge 11163), demanding that the agency lawfully justify its operational authority under strict United States Republic constitutional and historical parameters. At the heart of the dispute is an incident on January 14, 2026, which the supreme law of the land considers a staged kidnapping and an egregious abuse of Color-of-Law against an American native—Moorish-American national identified as ‘Ilhahi Bey’.
The Anatomy of an Incident: Jaywalking, Jurisdiction, and Allegations
According to the public filings and associated public notices, the confrontation began during the early morning hours of January 14, 2026. Austin Boniface, joined by three armed Orange County Sheriff’s Office colleagues, falsely arrested, under false pretenses, ‘Ilhahi Bey’, under the accusation of “jaywalking.”
The lawful challenge competently argues that the enforcement of jaywalking statutes represents an unconstitutional and obsolete policy. The public filing contends that such municipal codes function primarily as revenue-generation mechanisms for local agencies operating via commerce enrichment, rather than valid exercises of public safety. More critically, the Claimant’s lawful disposition and reference to true Constitutional law (not public policy) asserts that local policy-enforcing agencies lack jurisdiction over the natural and original inhabitants to the land as the Aboriginal and Indigenous American natives themselves, known to the competent, educated, and historically-studied, to be Moorish-American nationals. The truth at North America has been rooted in known international treaties and United States Republic Constitutional history.
Following the fraudulent street detention, Bey was kidnapped and taken to the Orange County Corrections Department Jail Administration, known to be a collective administrative human trafficking agency for profit for those who understand real civics. The Claimant has already revealed that his having been held hostage at the Jail Administration agency for four (4) months constituted an unlawful detention under United States Codes of Law (U.S.C) Title 28, Section 2254, and exposed him to cruel and unusual punishment, a direct violation of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution for the united States of America Republic 1787; 1791. Furthermore, the lawful writ claims that Austin Boniface committed perjury by submitting a fraudulent ICJIS (Integrated Criminal Justice Information System) arrest affidavit to initiate fraudulent charges against ‘Ilhahi Bey’.
The United States Republic Constitutional Arguments
The Quo Warranto writ served on October 6 relies heavily on true American constitutional fact-checking history and international diplomacy. The filing explicitly invokes the Constitution for the united States of America Republic 1787; 1791 A.D.—specifically Article VI—arguing that operational policies enacted by State and local agencies violate supreme federal and Constitutional law when applied to foreign or Indigenous nationals.
Central to the defense of the Claimant has been the Treaty of Peace and Friendship Between Morocco and United States 1787; 1836 A.D. Proponents of the supreme law of the land, clearly displayed within Article VI (6) of the Constitution for the united States of America Republic, maintain that Moorish-Americans retain their distinct historical nationality and national origin allegiance that protects them from unlawful municipal statutes enacted by State entities operating under corporate or statutory frameworks like the STATE OF FLORIDA.
Under the terms of the Averment of Jurisdiction, acting Sheriff John W. Mina and Austin Boniface, were given a strict three-day window to furnish a formal Delegation of Authority Order issued directly by the United States Congress. The lawful Averment of Jurisdiction writ demands viable proof that the policy-enforcing agency possesses explicit United States Republic Constitutional authorization (by lawful legislation) to enforce (execute) the specific municipal policies levied against the public masses. Because the Orange County Sheriff’s Office reportedly failed to produce the requested congressional documentation within the mandated timeframe, the Claimant’s United States Republic Constitutional disposition sustains that the entire agency bears full legal and financial liability for the actions of its public employees under Title 18, U.S.C. Section 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law).
Evidence – Exhibits
The October 2026 action does not stand in isolation. According to the Claimant’s public records, tensions between ‘Ilhahi Bey’ and Central Florida policy-enforcing agencies span several years, dating all the way back to 2021.
A Pattern of Systemic Harassment
The public Suit Action filing references a prior incident on December 4, 2023, involving James Baker of the City of Orlando Police Department (OPD), which the Claimant has previously been fraudulently subjected an unlawful detention and kidnapping. Furthermore, public records show that a formal International Color-of-Law Public Notice Warning was issued by Bey to the City of Orlando, State of Florida administration approximately six (6) years prior to the current matter.
Competent critics of the local administration point to such prior public notices as bona fide evidence that municipal agencies have long been aware of the jurisdictional disputes raised by upright and law-abiding (not policies) Moorish-American nationals. Despite the historical warnings over the years, supervisory officials across both the Orange County Sheriff’s Office employees and the City of Orlando Police Department employees have remained silent and unyielding, refusing to formally address or remedy the lawful grievances, despite their obligated Oaths or Affirmations to support the Constitution for the united States of America Republic 1787; 1791 A.D.
Broader Implications and Next Steps
The public filing of the Quo Warranto and the subsequent escalation to the Supreme Court of the United States place the lawful case under a unique Constitutional microscope for remedy. While mainstream foreign corporte-State barristers and tribunal Magistrates (unconstitutional persons with allegiance to the Crown of England) generally view arguments based on Moorish sovereignty and international historical treaties as “frivolous” within corporate-State and non-Article III (3) federal courts (also unconstitutional), the competent people throughout North America utilize such lawful writs to competently challenge the foundational legitimacy of municipal policing powers that were never even authorized per the organic United States Republic Constitution for the public record.
As the matter pends as a formal grievance claim submitted to the United States’ highest court (above all of its States), international observers and experts on true law are closely monitoring how the judicial system will immediately address the collision between local statutory enforcement and public policy interpretations of United States Republic constitutional and international law. For the Orange County Sheriff’s Office, the immediate challenge lies in financial recompense to the Claimant in the matter for compensatory and punitive damages for the Color-of-Law practiced against him by willful negligence and blatant disregard to Constitutional obligations, as well as his sufferings at the Orange County Corrections Jail during his unlawful detention.
All Rights Reserved – Right to Free Press, Free Association, Freedom of Speech, and Freedom of Expression
About The Author
