John G Roberts Jr Responsible for the Ensurememt of All United States Constitutional Rights Within All States
The Constitution for the united States of America Republic Has Been the Supreme Law of the Land at North America Since 1787 A.D.
SPECIAL REPORT: The Unresolved Constitutional Crisis—Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and the Historical Claims of Moorish-Americans
To understand the weight of the current lawful / legal grievances reaching the United States Supreme Court—and the controversies surrounding their handling—one must reexamine the historical truth that underpins the North American continent.
North America – Washington, District of Columbia— In the complex tapestry of American jurisprudence, few figures command the institutional authority of United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. Appointed to lead the united States’ highest court in 2005 A.D., Roberts stepped into a role with profound contractual obligations and responsibilities to uphold the integrity of the Constitution for the united States of America Republic 1787; 1791 A.D. However, as the lawful / legal landscape reaches a critical juncture, an international spotlight is increasingly being turned toward the federal judiciary, centering on systemic judicial misconduct, historical breaches of foundational treaties, and the unaddressed rights of Aboriginal and Indigenous Moorish-Americans.
The Foundational Contracts: Beyond the Standard Revelation
For generations, mainstream lawful and legal education has taught that the United States body politic operates strictly under the framework of the 1787; 1791 A.D. United States Republic Constitution and its subsequent 10 to 13 original amendments (those lawfully ratified by proper public convention protocol). Yet, a growing body of legal scholars, historians, and Indigenous advocates point to an even earlier foundational binding contract: the Treaty of Peace and Friendship Between Morocco and the United States, ratified in 1787 and renewed in 1836 A.D.
According to Moorish-American historical truth at North America, the vital historical treaty formally acknowledged the already established Moorish national government present on North American soil, long before the consolidation of the modern federal / municipal State(s)-outside of the original 13 colonies operating at North America by treaty only. Proponents of the truth assert that the Morocco referenced in the historic document pertains directly to the Aboriginal and Indigenous governance of North America, conducted originally by Moors at North America, rather than the Kingdom of Morocco located on the continent of Africa (formed by the French in 1956 A.D.).
For over a century and a half (150 years), truth-speakers argue, the true political reality of North America has been obscured by a veil of hostile colonialism since the 1800s. The Constitution for the united States of America Republic 1787; 1791 A.D. explicitly outlines the duties of all liable parties holding public office. However, competent critics still contend that various body politics operating within the united States / United States went rogue beginning in the mid-19th century, utilizing hostile military force and systemic policy to subjugate the Aboriginal and Indigenous peoples of the entire landmass.
A Century of Commercial Incorporation and Disenfranchisement
The historical trajectory of North America shifted dramatically following the post-Civil War era. Lawful courts across the land were progressively restructured into corporate entities optimized for commerce and profit. Competent critics still argue that society was systematically incorporated into a massive United States commercial conglomerate, designed to financially empower Caucasian / European migrants, who arrived seeking economic opportunity, but ultimately displaced the original inhabitants by utter betrayal and high treason against the people.
The original stewards to the entire North American continent—identified by bloodline descendancy and pedigree as Aboriginal and Indigenous Moorish-Americans (frequently miscategorized under colonial labels such as “Black” or “African-American“)—have faced over 150 years of calculated marginalization. Colonial-based court judiciaries, critics have already discovered, have continually manipulated the legal apparatus to deny absolute Constitutional protections to the Moors, keeping them locked within a system of administrative and commercial control for enslavement and indentured servitude endeavors for financial profits by peonage (i.e. “chattel property“).
Furthermore, competent advocates note that when modern Moorish-Americans attempt to assert their national origin and Constitutional rights outside of historically-imposed slave surnames (i.e. Smith, Johnson, Williams, etc., etc.), they are frequently subjected to systemic resistance and judicial misconduct by judicially-obligated parties like John G Roberts Jr. State and federal court systems, along with Domestic Police Forces, have at many times utilized intentional bureaucratic hurdles or dismissed legitimate Writs by fraudulently labeling Claimants (mainly Moorish-Americans) as “Sovereign Citizens“—a tactic supreme law of the land advocates recognized as a deliberate effort to delegitimize lawful inquiries into historical colonialism and treaty violations.
Chief Justice John G Roberts Jr and the Current Judicial Misconduct Dilemma
Fast-forward to 2026 A.D., and the international community continues to observe how domestic judiciaries, both State and Federal, have been mishandling case submissions regarding the deep-seated historical grievances experiences by the original inhabitants known as Moors / Moorish-Americans of said African-descent.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., having presided over the Supreme Court for over two decades, is now facing intense scrutiny from Moorish-American communities all over North America, as well as naturalized citizens via the general public. Recent reports highlight Judicial Misconduct directed at the Roberts Jr administration, specifically concerning the routine, unacknowledged dismissal of formal, lawful Writs and competent Constitutional remedies submitted by Moorish-Americans, who follow de jure law and Common law already prescribed for remedy to the people in the form of Res Judicata and Stare Decisis case law already historically ruled upon by past competent Article III (3) federal judiciaries, who upheld their Oaths of Office to support the Constitution for the united States of America Republic and enforce the supreme law of the land in favor of the people (not companies / corporations via corrupted States).
Claimants forced to submit petitions via lawful grievances continually argue that by failing to engage with competent lawful arguments regarding foundational Constitutional duties, treaty obligations, and historical property rights, the highest court upon the land at North America is perpetuating a continuous Deprivation of rights and Conspiracy against rights against the people (especially Moorish-Americans). Under established lawful / legal doctrine, bound judiciaries—especially the Chief Justice of the United States—cannot arbitrarily deny access to Constitutional remedy for any and all injured parties operating by Constitutional principality only. However, a series of recent case submissions by Moorish-Americans seeking federal intervention against State-level administrative abuses, have been left intentionally ignored by the Supreme Court of the United States Clerk of the Court, Scott S. Harris (another bound party to the United States Republic Constitution).
The Road Ahead: Seeking Full Rectification and Rapid Remedy
As the world watches, the debate over the true nature of American jurisprudence and colonial history at North America intensifies. For the millions of Moorish-Americans domiciling all over North American soil, the struggle is not merely about modern legal technicalities; the absolute truth surrounds the restoration of birthrights (not to be confused with Birthright Citizenship), the correction of historical fabrications, and the enforcement of internationally-binding contracts (such as the United States Republic Constitution and the treaty) that predate the modern corporate States like Florida.
Whether the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John G Roberts Jr will address the compelling historical claims, or continue to maintain procedural silence, will determine the liabilities already in place for willful negligence, by blatant Judicial Misconduct against the people for the public record. What is certain, however, is that the demand for full transparency, true accountability, and lawful remedy for the Aboriginal and Indigenous peoples at North America will not be silenced as the true record of history at North America continues to unfold and irresponsible persons are brought to justice for malfeasance concerning long-overdue justice for the Moors at North America.
All Rights Reserved – Right to Free Press, Free Association, Freedom of Speech, and Freedom of Expression
About The Author
