United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District is Currently Under Public Scrutiny For Denying an Estate Heir Due Process
All Federal Courts at North America and Their Employees Have Been Bound to the Republic Constitution – See Articles III, IV, and VI
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District Under Public Scrutiny for Due Process Violations
North America – Washington, District of Columbia – The United States District Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is facing a growing storm of controversy over hindering due process, specifically in a case involving an Aboriginal and Indigenous Al Moroccan / American / Moor / Moorish American / American native / American national of said African-descent at North America. The lawful suit action case, which centers around corporate malfeasance and financial exploitation, has raised serious questions about the court’s lawful federal adherence to fundamental principles and bound obligations within the United States Republic Constitution and its Bill of Rights contract at North America.
At the heart of the matter is the estate heir’s attempt to seek lawful, Constitutional redress through the federal tribunal / court system. The Al Moroccan / American national proved that a corporation defrauded him on North American soil and subsequently filed a suit action for lawful remedy, presenting what is a lawful case based entirely on the supreme law of the land clause within the Constitution for the united states of America / united States of America Republic. However, reports indicate that employees / agents within the United States Eleventh Circuit District court system have tampered with the evidence submitted by the estate heir, while simultaneously attempting to financially exploit him for the return of the case documents submitted to the tribunal / court. The actions conducted by David J. Smith, who is the current Clerk of Court for the Eleventh District, represents a significant breach of guaranteed Constitutional protections for the estate heir.
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Republic Constitution guarantees Due Process, ensuring that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without the fair application of the law. Such includes the right to a fair trial (if requested by the Claimant), the ability to present evidence, and the assurance that the lawful process will be impartial. The truth revealed against the United States District Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit suggest a blatant violation of the fundamental Constitutional rights, clearly undermining the very binding judiciary (and their administrative staff) obligations within Articles III (3), IV (4), and VI (6) to the Constitution for the united states of America / united States of America Republic for the public record.
Further adding to the complexity of the situation is the direct involvement of David J. Smith, the current Clerk of Court for the United States District Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District. Reports suggest that Mr. Smith has been avoiding direct engagement with the estate heir, delegating elusive and deceptive communication to subordinate employees. Competent critics argue that such avoidance, coupled with the refusal to return the estate heir’s lawful court suit action documents (consisting of eleven copies for filing, all paid for in 2025 A.D.) raises serious concerns about transparency, liability, and full accountability within the federal court bound to the Constitution for the united states of America / united States of America Republic.
The specific role of the Clerk of Court has been historically significant, dating back to the earliest days of the United States (after 1787 A.D.). The Clerk has always been responsible for maintaining accurate and transparent records, managing tribunal / court filings, and ensuring the integrity of the de jure law judicial process. Actions that appear to obstruct or impede access to the tribunals / courts, particularly when evidence tampering and financial exploitation are involved, undermine public trust and demand immediate investigation, liabilities, and overall full accountability of all parties involved.
The unfolding situation also brings into focus the broader context of Aboriginal and Indigenous rights and the complex landscape surrounding Aboriginal and Indigenous Al Moroccans / Moors / Moorish Americans of said African-descent at North America. While the high In Propria Persona status and birth-rights of the rightful estate heirs (i.e. Al Moroccans / Moors / Moorish Americans of said African-descent) have been fraudulently subject to political debate and intentional misinterpretation by Caucasian colonizer frauds from Europe still escheating the North Gate Estate / North America, the fundamental right to Due Process applies equally to all estate heirs and lawfully naturalized citizens, who are competent Moorish subjects, honoring the estate heirs with a mutual respect.
Under the international lawful circumstances, it has been crucial to remember that the Supreme Court of the United States (originally the United States Supreme Court for the Republic), under Article III of the Constitution, has the ultimate arbiter of lawful disputes and the remedy for grievances submitted by the people… especially involving the many abuses from corporate persons operating fraudulently (or with fraudulent intent) at North America against the people. The one Supreme Court has consistently had the obligation to uphold the importance of Due Process and the right to a fair trial by jury of a Claimant’s own peers (if requested by a lawful Claimant – also referred to as “injured party”), as a natural person, and never a corporate person or entity falsifying injury for financial gain, while abusing the lawful judicial process meant for the protection of peoples’ rights… especially rightful heirs to the estate. Similarly, Article IV to the United States Republic Constitution guarantees that citizens of each state are entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states. Although the specific word “nationals” is not used (referring to private citizens to a true nation – United States is not a nation, so U.S. Citizens do not lawfully qualify for “diversity” under normal circumstances) when referring to the Diversity of Citizenship clause, the same lawful principle is applied for national disputes at North America.
The discovered facts against the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit are serious and warrant immediate attention. A thorough and impartial investigation is necessary to determine the veracity of these claims and to ensure that all estate heirs, have equal access to de jure law justice (with federal and international remedies) and the protection of their Constitutional rights. The world is watching, and the integrity of the United States Law system is on the line in 2025A.D. moving forward.
All Rights Reserved – Right to Free Press, Free Association, Freedom of Speech, and Freedom of Expression
About The Author
